The Podcasting Specification Working Group has posted an open letter to the podcasting community on its new blog.
Now, let me say first off that I support (almost) anything which promotes podcasting. But…
On the Podcasting Innovations news group I posted this reply to their open letter:
I agree with Garrick. The majority of aggregators now support enclosures in RSS and the”feed:” 1 click addition, so “One Click Subscription” of podcasts is already here.
However, you also stated that you wish to standardize the Meta data describing podcasts? In what way? The RSS feed already included date and time of publish. Feed name, Post name (presumably the same as the show name), the enclosure, and a description of the contents. What more is there?
After all, the description will vary in length from show to show, depending on the subject. As will the number of links to external resources mentioned in the show. Surely services, which would have searchable indexes of podcasts would focus on the Feed name, Show name, and then also have the description searchable. All that’s really left is to get all podcasts “catchers” to have the ability to display the description of the show to you before you commence download.
Forgive me for sounding negative. I’m not. I just don’t see where you’re going with this…
Much of what you’ve stated in the open letter already exists, and while I support anything that supports podcasting, I fail to see what issues you will actually be addressing here.
With all the new podcasting related sites popping up over the last few weeks, I fear that it may become a case of “too many cooks spoil the broth”.
After all, while podcasting can have commercial application, isn’t it still mostly in the realm of the amateur user, a bit like the “ham radio” of the computer world? Isn’t the fun in podcasting doing things your own way?
UPDATE: Everyone should pop along to the Podcasting Innovations newsgroup to keep track of this discussion. It got going around message number 171.