Paul O'Flaherty

Brain to mouth filter removed since 1978

Archive for March, 2007

29 March
2007
12Comments

Is the trackback dead? Only if you’re selfish?

Steve Rubel thinks that trackbacks feel irrelevant!

These days, however, the TrackBack feels irrelevant. Sebastian Kiel agrees with me. So does Jeff Harrell. It’s been replaced by little widgets that have the same effect. You’ll notice that all of my posts have a chicklet that show the number of links and diggs. This is powered by Feedburner.

Jeff Harrell thinks trackbacks are becoming useless.

Do people still use trackbacks? Have they fallen out of vogue because they’re rarely automatic and a pretty significant pain to invoke manually?

I’m thinking about disabling them on this site, and removing them from the checklist of features I include on new sites I build.

Here’s the flaw in the thinking of folks who think that the widget and chicklet will kill the trackback!

Widgets and chicklets are selfish! By disabling trackbacks in favor of chicklets /widgets your forcing your user to take an extra step to see who else is involved in the conversation.

On my blog, when I receive a trackback, it appears in the top of the comments for each post and the user can quickly and easily see what other blogs are involved in the conversation.  Why would I make my readers jump through hoops and force them to click through to other services in order to see if any other blogs are involved in the conversation.

Now, I’m not saying that chicklets or widgets are bad. I just fail to see the benefit behind forcing your users to click through to another site to see who’s linking in.

Okay, not everybody sends trackbacks (why not you fools?) and the external services do provide a means of seeing who is in the conversation but hasn’t sent a trackback.

Yes there can be an issue sometimes with trackback spam. But it’s not that big an issue! I receive over 1000 comment spams a day, and very few, if any lately have been trackback spam. Quite a few months ago I got hit by a lot of trackback spam, but it never made it onto the blog.

There are plenty of tools available to protect you site from comment and trackback spam.

I have sent trackbacks and pings to blogs only to find out that the blogger in question has disabled them.

These people are, selfish! They’ve robbing their readers of easy discovery of other bloggers with valid opinions on the same topic. They’re robbing their readers because they’re to lazy to install a few plugins and moderate their comments.

Some folks will say, that some of the reason for this is because they want to keep readers on their site and not have them click off to other blogs.

If so why would you employ chicklets/widgets on your blog?

As was looking  at the comments on Steve and Jeff’s blogs I see that they both still have trackbacks enabled .

I also spotted this excellent comment by Lorelle on Jeff’s blog. I’m reproducing it here as I don’t seem to be able to link directly to the comment! (Actually I don’t think I can do that on this blog either! I’ll have to fix that!)

Trackbacks are essential and invaluable. In many respects, I’d rather have a trackback than a comment.

A trackback says “someone’s talking about you”. It connects your blog to another blog, building the dynamic energy of links in the true definition of the web.

It isn’t about “link juice” or popularity contests. People can add all the judgments they want to trackbacks, but that is all they do. Alert you that someone has posted your blog post in their blog. Whether or not they are saying something isn’t part of their job description. They just say “you have been mentioned”.

A trackback is much like a reference in a research paper or doctoral thesis. It is credit. And it is nice that it happens automatically.

Trackbacks help to alert you to possible splogs and copyright violations. If you include a link back to your blog and blog posts in your post, if it gets scraped by feed scrapers, you will get a trackback that alerts you to their illegal use of your content.

Not many people still use Technorati for the end all and be all of their research or monitoring world. They are too busy Twittering. ;-)

If you haven’t gotten a legitimate trackback in ages, then consider what and how you write. Maybe you haven’t written anything lately worth linking to and discussing off your blog? I don’t know. There is certainly a lot of competition for links now. But I’d look at that first before slamming an incredibly powerful tool in the blogging and web world.

As I read through the comments I’m forced to notice that many of the ones which agree that trackbacks are dead are heavily based in the “I”, such as this one by Tiffany!

I think Lorelle’s opinion of trackbacks is stuck in 2003.

When I had incoming trackbacks enabled, I literally spent an hour every morning cleaning the crap up off my blog and out of my inbox that had accumulated overnight. Even when I turned them off in the interface, spammers still found ways to abuse the system, so I finally had to delete the trackback script itself from the server to get any peace. And not just on my personal blog- my professional blog, frequently linked to and talked about in its niche- because Trackback wasn’t giving me anything I couldn’t get from a combination of other tools that had the advantage of not covering my blog in ads for hentai and online poker.

And of course no one relies just on Technorati- they also use referrer logs, Google tools, web stats packages, del.icio.us, etc. to track who is saying what about whom. But Trackback/Pingback is a broken tool. It hasn’t been “incredibly powerful” in years. For every legitimate trackback I was getting (and there were quite a few), I was getting easily 200 spam ones. Not an effective use of my time, and certainly not an efficient way of telling me where I was getting linked from.

Comments such as the one written by Tiffany betray a mindset that makes me reluctant to visit her blog. (I have never read Tiffany’s blog, so I’m not commenting on the quality of her blog, simply the comment in question).

The comment shows a self-centric attitude only concerned with the author tracking what other people might be writing about her. It shows no regard, nor desire to have her readers involved in the larger conversation.

I believe that people enjoy blogs because they are a link centric information source. When I read an interesting post on a blog I usually read the comments as well. If there are trackbacks I sometimes follow them.

I never, repeat NEVER go to Technorati or any other service and perform a search to ascertain who’s linking to a particular post on somebody else’s blog.

My assumption is that if there’s no trackbacks and few or no comments then nobodies talking!

If the topic is actually important enough or interesting enough some one else will have written about and it  will turn up in my feed reader. Unfortunately, I will probably miss many great posts related to the article and I don’t get to see trackbacks in my feed reader.

There’s also the issue that many bloggers are not inclined to link to blogs that have trackbacks disabled. But that’s a whole other post!

At the end of the day, if you disable trackbacks you’re not only being selfish, but robbing your readers of the broader conversation!

Here’s a question? Are bloggers who disable trackbacks (and/or comments) displaying a fear of possibly being contradicted or proven wrong before the eyes of their readers?

29 March
2007
1Comment

Tech Innovation? Think Denmark!

According to a the “Networked Readiness Index” (PDF  28kb),  published by the World Economic Forum, Denmark is is now the world’s leading country for technology innovation!

The U.S., long considered the “place to be” for tech innovation has lost it’s crown and falls down to 7th place.

What’s really interesting is that 3 of the Nordic countries are in the top 4 places and all 5 are in the top 10. The BBC is calling the prevalence of the Nordic countries in the top 10 the “Nordic Crown”:

Nordic crown

Denmark is now regarded as the world leader in technological innovation and application, with its Nordic neighbours Sweden, Finland and Norway claiming second, fourth and 10th place respectively.

“Denmark, in particular, has benefited from the very effective government e-leadership, reflected in early liberalisation of the telecommunications sector, a first-rate regulatory environment and large availability of e-government services,” said Irene Mia, senior economist at World Economic Forum.

It must be all that cold weather we get at winter!

Here’s the PDF file of the index, and her’s the official press release!

(Via the BBC

28 March
2007
0Comments

Unlimited e-mail storage?

CNet reports that Yahoo is going to be the first of the major free e-mail providers to offer unlimited storage on their free Web-based accounts.

Yahoo will begin offering unlimited storage for its free Web-based e-mail in May, the company announced late Tuesday. The move makes Yahoo the first of the major free e-mail providers to offer unlimited storage, but it likely will not be the last.

Yahoo currently offers 1 gigabyte for its free mail service and 2GB for its premium fee-based service. Google’s free Gmail service offers more than 2.5GB of storage, and Windows Live Hotmail offers 2GB for free.

I have a free yahoo account (I have to to use sites such as Flickr) but I don’t think that unlimited storage will be enough to pull me away from my Gmail account.

As I see it, now that Yahoo have upped the ante, the other big players will eventually step up and offer the same thing to compete (Google already promises that they’ll keep increasing Gmail storage indefinitely).

As it stands right now, Google’s integration of their other service (calendar, docs etc.) is superior to to Yahoo’s and the effort required to port all my stuff to Yahoo would not be worth the short term benefits of unlimited storage when you can be certain that the other big players will want to play catch up!

Although, if Yahoo were to up the attachment size beyond 10 megs and allowed us to use it as an online drive (Gmail Space anybody) then I might consider using it a bit more.

You can expect to see the new storage limits being rolled out in May!

The unlimited storage will begin rolling out globally in May, and Yahoo expects to have all of its customers covered within a month, except for China and Japan. “We will continue working with these markets on their storage plans,” Kremer said.

Via Techdirt.

28 March
2007
2Comments

Your best time management tips!

Digital Clock This post is a cry for help! I need your suggestions dear readers!

Time management is a skill that we all need, especially, if like me, you work for yourself and have no evil overload employer or wannabe supervisor putting pressure on you to reach a deadline.

My major problem is that I tend to get lost in the creativity process. Once I get my teeth into something, such as coding, I tend to blot out all else until it’s done. I get into a flow, and getting into that flow and it may take me 30 minutes or more to get sufficiently involved that I start doing really quality work. Once I’m in the flow I don’t like to be distracted or break the flow, or I have to start the process again!

Unfortunately, getting so involved with work is detrimental as I tend to forget other things and end up setting alarms to remind me of  important appointments because I definitely can’t miss them.

So, what I’m looking for folks, is some suggestions as to what people can do to manage their time better and have a more efficient working day?

Leave your tips in the comments! The best tips will make it into a new post with a quality link back to the authors blog!

(Image by Russell James Smith)

27 March
2007
1Comment

Scoble to stop blogging in support of Kathy Sierra!

Robert Scoble is taking a week off from blogging in support of Kathy Sierra!

So, since she doesn’t feel safe. I’m going to stop blogging in support of Kathy, who I consider a friend and someone who’s voice would be dearly missed here. I’ll be back Monday.

I’ve already posted, expressing my support for Kathy and my disgust at the entire situation. I feel like I could have written more, but words fail me when it comes to expressing my disgust, and what I want to say has been better expressed by others.

Scoble scratches the surface of a larger point which needs to be addresses in geekdom:

It’s this culture of attacking women that has especially got to stop. I really don’t care if you attack me. I take those attacks in stride. But, whenever I post a video of a female technologist there invariably are snide remarks about body parts and other things that simply wouldn’t happen if the interviewee were a man.

I’m not a psychologist, but I feel that the reason such attacks occur is because of predominately male population of the blogosphere. The male population appears to me to have a disproportionately large number “None’s”?

What are nones? Well, they’re the male geek population that, with regards to sex..

Never Had None!

Can’t Get None!

Don’t Want None!

None!

These are not the geek’s with social lives, and an existence outside of the internet!

These are not Geeks 2.0. These are not the intelligent and informed people who read this blog!

These are Geeks 1.0.

These are the adolescents who live at their computers and knowledge of appropriate conduct and sexuality comes from the YouTube videos their class mates have posted where they kick each other in the balls for fun (that might prove to be an effective genetic cleanser with regards to stupidity!).

These are the same Geek 1.0 adults who’s main accomplishment in life is that they’ve managed to age to a point where they are legally considered adult, but have gained little more in life other than a large waistline.

These are the people who give US all a bad name. These people may actually even understand that what they are doing is wrong, harmful, and scary, but do it anyway because they simply don’t care.

Nobody except them matters in their little private world!

The problem is that there is very little we can do about Geek 1.0. At least not with the current generation. But we can educate out children to ensure that the next geek generation doesn’t from the same problems as geek 1.0!

As I see it Geeks have evolved through 3 states.

  • Geek 1.0 (The ones I’m discussing here)
  • Geek 1.0 Alpha – The Alpha geeks of the past geek generation who actually did something with their life besides getting older
  • Geek 2.0 – The readers of this blog and blogs like Kathy’s

It’s probably impossible to reeducate Geek 1.0, so I propose we take some advice from Edward Longshanks in Braveheart (wikipedia link).

The problem with the blogosphere is that it’s full of Geeks 1.0

If we can’t get the out! Let’s breed them out!

By that I mean, lets raise our children properly so that this behavior is completely unacceptable in their minds. I’m not talking about limiting free speech! I’m simply talking about morality and instilling common sense values.

Oh, and I said “let’s raise our children”! That does not mean, let’s have the nanny state raise our children and have them pass more stupid laws that limit freedom of speech to make up for people not being raised properly in the first place.

27 March
2007
2Comments

Great holiday! Disgusted on return!

I got back last night from Lalandia after an excellent few days away. I tried ice skating for the first time. No photo’s of that, thankfully.

Actually I wasn’t bad at it but I did fall 4 or 5 times and on 3 of the falls I whacked my left elbow fairly bad which means that today it’s all purple and annoying me every time I put my arm down on the armrest of my chair.

I’ve bee busy all morning loading up the link blog with the best items from the past few days but one thing that caught my attention immediately was this post by Kathy Sierra stating that she has received death threats from within the blogosphere which have forced her to drop out of speaking at events and reconsider if she will continue blogging.

I do not want to be part of a culture–the Blogosphere–where this is considered acceptable. Where the price for being a blogger is kevlar-coated skin and daughters who are tough enough to not have their “widdy biddy sensibilities offended” when they see their own mother Photoshopped into nothing more than an objectified sexual orifice, possibly suffocated as part of some sexual fetish. (And of course all coming on the heels of more explicit threats)

I do not want to be part of a culture where this is done not by some random person, but by some of the most respected people in the tech blogging world. People linked to by A-listers like Doc Searls, a co-author of Chris Locke. I do not want to be part of a culture of such hypocrisy where Jeneane Sessum can be a prominent member of blogher, a speaker at industry conferences, an outspoken advocate for women’s rights, and at the same time celebrate and encourage a site like meankids — where objectification of women is taken to a level that makes plain old porn seem quaintly sweet.

This disgusts me! My heart goes out to Kathy and I really do hope they catch and punish the people responsible for this.

This kind of behavior hurts the entire blogosphere on a  number of levels. The behavior itself is simply despicable and has seriously hurt Kathy, as it would anybody who was subjected to it.

Kathy’s story is now one more reason for potentially good bloggers not to joining the blogosphere and adds fuel to the fire for all the whack jobs who want to control the internet, monitor everything we do and remove any remaining privacy.

If Kathy does not return to blogging it will be a tremendous loss. She, without doubt, writes one of the most intelligent and informative blogs out there. If you don’t believe me just check out the comments on the bottom of her last post.

23 March
2007
0Comments

Lalandia here I come

Just about to start packing for Lalandia! We leave in a few hours for a family holiday to celebrate frigid bitch’s dads 60th birthday which is on Sunday!

Any geeks in the area want to meet up tomorrow evening? My mobile number is 61960628.

Oh, I just spotted this on bLaugh:

Are You a Twitter Ninja?

22 March
2007
3Comments

Don’t join out of obligation!

Let’s get one thing straight MyBlogLog users!

I do not expect you to join my community just because I join users.

It also applies the other way around.

When you join my community it does not mean I will automatically join your community.

The same applies to adding me as a contact and vice versa.

Also, sending me messages like this one is a sure fire way to make me say no!

GooglrGooglr 22nd Mar 12:13 pm
(reply | report spam | delete)

[Private] Would you like to join my community. I will return the favour……

And will also result in me posting this on your community page!

 

PaulOFPaulOF 22nd Mar 1:00 pm

No thanks! I don’t believe in joining communities just for the favor. Join mine only if you like the site! I’ll join yours IF I like your site! Sorry, but I only want community members who actually use my site!

This has been a public service announcement on behalf of the “Don’t ask stupid questions” department!

Update 26-03-2007: I’ve exchanged a few emails with Googlr today. He’s explained to me that he wasn’t intentionally spamming, he was just trying to make some friends and didn’t quite get how messages such as this one could be considered spam. All is well! And I wish Googlr the best with his blog!

22 March
2007
8Comments

Does Twitter have built in Trust?

Andy thinks that Twitter is unethical for business use and therefore made his last business related Twitter post last night!

Andy
AndyBeard I can’t find a way to use Twitter to comply with WOMMA so last business related update from me – full details here – http://tinyurl.com/29yr

Andy cites the following reasons:

Twitter is thus being used for WOMM (Word of Mouth Marketing), and should be subject to the same ethics rules and recommendations as blogging.

  • Disclosure in the Twitter Interface – currently impossible because there simply isn’t enough room in 160 characters.
    <image removed>
  • Disclosure Link – maybe an ethical possibility, but you can’t add anchor text, and not all the URL is displayed
    <image removed>
  • Disclosure In Content – it is hard enough already to say anything meaningful within the number of words allowed, there is no way you could add a disclosure to the content as well.

Okay, I can see where you’re coming from with this one Andy, however I think you’re very much missing the fact that because you choose who your receive Twitters from, there is an expectation that you know what kind of Twitters you’re going to receive.

If you add Steve Rubel to your Twitter friends, you expect to get links to marketing stuff and stuff he’s related to. That’s why you added him to your Twitter friends list in the first place. Surely you can’t tell me it’s really because your interested in what the guy had for breakfast?

If you add Cali Lewis you expect to get updates about GeekBrief TV (awesome video podcast for those of you who don’t know it).

If you add me, you’ll expect links to stuff all over the web, and updates on my  podcast etc…

If I start a Twitter profile for my company, the I have to tell my customers that I have a Twitter profile they can follow, and then, as it is a company profile, it comes preloaded with the expectation that it will link to company related stuff.

You see Andy, it’s the entire “expectation” angle that makes Twitter ethical for word of mouth marketing.

You don’t just go to Twitter and start adding names at random to your friends list without first knowing a little something about who these people are. 

When I added Steve Rubel, I knew I’d get marketing related stuff! When I added Cali Lewis, I knew that some of the posts would be about GeekBrief related stuff! (It’s also nice to know what the prettiest and one of the smartest women in tech is up to!)

Twitter is not blogging! Actually, this level of innate expectation separates it even further from blogging! When you visit somebody’s blog that you’ve never heard of you have to research who they are by reading their posts and profiles to learn if you want to continue reading and trust their links.

You don’t need to do that with Twitter because you’ve already taken that step when you visited their blog, podcast or whatever and decided to follow them on Twitter.

Now, I’m fully aware that you can add people you don’t know especially if you have a ton of followers and just use the “add all” feature.

But if you add 200 or 1000 people that you don’t know, then you expect to get hit with crap and unethical links from time to time. It comes with the territory and it’s your own fault for adding them in the first place. You can remove offending linkers again, but it’s your own fault for adding unknowns to begin with.

The public timeline is not a marketing tool. The lifespan of a Twitter on the first page of the public timeline is to short to make it viable for any kind of exposure.

People add who they want to add, and should know what to expect of a person when they choose to add them to their friends list.

It’s to be expected that most bloggers (and others) will hold themselves to the same standard of linking on Twitter as they do on their blogs. If they don’t it will hurt their reputation with their followers. They’re followers are they’re audience and their blog readers. They know all to well, that if they do something unethical and get called out on it on Twitter, it will have the same negative reaction and effect as if they did it on their own blog.

If you added somebody to your Twitter friends, and they later betrayed the trust and expectation that came with adding them, then simply “unfriend” them and unsubscribe from their blog.

Twitter is like standing at the bar in the pub with your mates.

You don’t probe your friends about every recommendation they make to you. You expect them, not to recommend anything harmful to you! Its a very rate occasion when  you care if the recommendation benefits them as long as it benefits you as well.

But if they make a recommendation and you get burned, then you hold them accountable for it and possibly stop being friends with them.

22 March
2007
1Comment

Passed the 50,000 spam mark

 I just logged in and realized that Akismet has now stopped over 50,000 pieces of spam from reaching this site.

How did I ever live without this plugin?

Even when it started shipping with WordPress there was a long while before I actually got a key for it and started suing it.

Askimer 50000 spams

This must actually have happened sometime yesterday but I didn’t realize it. Well, it was 2am when I last scanned the spam for false positives.

Anyway, as much as I love Akismet and the job it does here on the site, I do still think there are ways in which it could be improved.

21 March
2007
0Comments

Link Roll Up 21/03/2007

I’ve been filling the link blog all morning with the best posts from all the feeds I follow.

It’s starting to look like today won’t be a good day for me blogging, so I’m highlighting a couple of cool things here that may have warranted a post in response or are just damn cool, but I don’t have time to get around to today.

Andy Beard – WOMMA Should Watch Who They Quote And Especially Who They Link Too!

Member Alert: WOMMA Supports Clear Disclosure of Compensation on Blogs – Womma go PayPerPost spanking!

Jason Calacanis – More proof that there is no A List (or at least if there is, it means NOTHING!)

Google Image Ripper (Warning NSFW by default) via Cord Silverstein

Steven Hodson – Misuse of Technorati and and the dirty links

Rok Hrastnik – Why is Everyone Missing the RSS Transactional Messaging Opportunity?

MacDailyNews – Unauthorized Obama Internet political ad converts Apple’s famous ‘1984’ commercial (with video)

Hillary 1984 video

Original Apple 1984 video

Ars Technica -NFL fumbles DMCA takedown battle, could face sanctions

Firefox 2.0.0.3 Available

Just even more stuff in the link blog!